Saturday 16 July 2011

Here We Go Again - More Proposed Changes To UK Visa's

In July 2011 the UK government published a consultation on proposed changes to family migration (which includes the spouse of British nationals).  The closing date if you wish to respond to the consultation is on 6th October 2011.  The implementation of the proposals is to take place from April 2012.
As we will be submitting my wife's settlement visa application before this date, it remains to be seen how the proposed changes will effect us.  However, the consultation contains important information for those considering applying for settlement to the UK over the coming months.  The document is long and involved so I have tried to extract the important information in relation to spouses in keeping with the theme of this blog.

The consultation follows on from recent changes to other areas such as student and economic visa  applications "We have already capped the number of economic migrants coming to the UK from outside the European Economic Area. We have announced plans to reform student visas and to clamp down on bogus colleges. We also recently launched a consultation aimed at breaking the link between temporary migration and permanent settlement. As a result of our policies we anticipate net migration will be in the tens of thousands in future.  But we have been clear that we will take action across all the routes of entry to the UK, so we must also take action on the family migration route" 


From what I can tell the key proposals relating to spouse applications are as follows:-

  • Increasing the probationary period before applying for settlement from two years to five years.  As it stands when a foreign spouse enters the UK they are given a two year probation period.  After that two years they can then apply for ILR (Indefinite Leave to Remain).  This will be increased to five years under the new proposals.  This would also mean that the spouse would also not be able to claim benefits until after that five year period.
  • Introducing stricter or a more clear definition of what they consider to be a "genuine and continuing relationship, marriage or partnership".  How exactly they intend to do that is not clear and they "invite views on how that definition should be framed".  One suggestion is that "the couple have been in a relationship for a minimum of 12 months prior to the marriage visa or leave to remain application, and must be able to evidence regular contact during those 12 months."
  • Increasing the income requirement of the sponsor considered sufficient to support the applicant without the need for recourse to public funds.  At present, what is considered sufficient is based on the current level of Income Support.  The document states that only the sponsors income and savings will be taken into account.  It is also suggested that, given the current economic climate, the applicants potential earnings from working in the UK will not be taken into account as part of the requirement.  Third party support will also not be considered, an example being if the sponsors parents were providing financial support for the couple.
  • Reintroduction of an "attachment requirement".  This means that the applicant and sponsor would have to show a combined "attachment" to the UK greater than to any other country other than marriage.  The proposed outline of this is based on the system used in Denmark.  One criteria of the Danish system states that the applicant must have visited the country at least 2 times before applying for the visa.
  • Applicants to have an understanding of "everyday English".  This would mean an increase to the B1 level from the current A1 level.
  • Currently couples who have lived together for 4 years or more outside of the UK can be granted immediate settlement, leave to remain on return to the UK.  Under the new proposals they would be made to complete the new 5 year probationary period.
  • Appeals for family visitor visa refusals would be scrapped
So what are my thoughts?  Well there are probably some good points in there and also some bad.  I haven't had a chance to get my head around everything yet, simply because of the volume of information in there. What I haven't mentioned in the above is the amount of times the "burden on the tax payer" is highlighted in the consultation document.  It's brought up too many times in my opinion and it seems like the government are using this as the basis to win favour with the general public.  I also believe that the proposals are politically motivated, rather than a genuine attempt to tackle the immigration issue.

For anyone thinking of going down the settlement visa route these are important times and I would seriously recommend having a read through the consultation.  It may seem like pretty boring stuff but could potentially have a major impact on future applications.  The consultation can be found here:-

Instructions on how to respond to the consultation can be found here:-
Closing date for responding to the consultation is 6th October 2011

I suspect the decision on which, if any of the proposals will be implemented has already been made.  But I for one will certainly be taking the time to complete the response form.  I would suggest anyone with a personal interest do the same, however little effect it may or may not have on the outcome.

Steve





Monday 11 July 2011

TB Test Certificate Issued

I mentioned briefly in another post about the TB test which is required for anyone wishing to stay in the UK for longer than six months.  Today Janny was in Bangkok to have her test.  Thankfully she was issued with a certificate, but again not without some drama. 
The only office which can issue the TB test certificate is the IOM (International Organisation for Migration) based in Bangkok.  Janny took the overnight bus from Phuket up to Bangkok (12hrs ouch!) and was met by a friend at the bus station who took her to the IOM office.  Janny had called the IOM a week before to book an early appointment.  When she called she was told to bring her passport plus one photocopy, her ID card plus photocopy and also two passport sized photos.  After registering at the office, Janny was told to go to Phyathai hospital for her x-ray.  There are two hospitals which the IOM use for the the x-rays, Phyathai and Bumrungrad. 
Janny took a taxi from the IOM to Phyathai hospital where it didn't take long to have her x-ray done and then back to the IOM.  At this point it was around 12.00 Thai time so I called her from home before I headed to work to see how she was getting on.  First thing she said to me was "I not pass".  Great I thought, nothings ever easy for us.  I don't know exactly what the issue was with her x-ray, but they told Janny to go back and have another x-ray done. 
So again, another taxi ride to Phyathai, another x-ray and back to the IOM.  Luckily this time Janny was issued with a certificate.  I can only presume that there may have been something small showing on the first x-ray and the IOM wanted another just to confirm that there wasn't a serious issue.  I had heard of some people having to go back to the IOM on cosecutive days or even weeks for further tests, so we were both relieved to have the certificate issued.  
So anyway by 15.00 a very tired but relieved Janny was heading back to the bus station with her TB certificate.  When the IOM gave Janny her certificate, they told her to keep it with her when she flies because she will need to present it at immigration. 

So thats another requirement ticked off the list.  Some useful addresses and links as follows:-

TB Test fee: 2600baht
Validity Period: 6 months

International Organisation for Migration
Kasemkij Building
8th Floor, 120 Silom Road
Bangrak, Bangkok 10500
Tel: +66 2 234 7950-5
Fax: + 66 2 234 7956

Phyathai 2 Hospital                                       Bumrungrad Int Hospital 943
Phaholyothin Rd                                           33 Sukhumvit 3
Phyathai, Bangkok                                        Bangkok
10400                                                          10110

http://www.vfs-uk-th.com/tb.aspx
http://www.vfs-uk-th.com/images/IOMInformationSheetEnglish.pdf
http://www.vfs-uk-th.com/images/kasemkij%20map.pdf

Monday 4 July 2011

Visa Fee - Another Money Making Scam?

***Amendment 30/08/11 - Well maybe the Embassy are reading my blog :) from earlier this month the rate being applied by the Embassy has been changed to 50thb to the £.  Still not quite the more realistic 48 but its a start***

Can anyone remember the last time they were getting 52thb to the pound in Thailand?  It certainly hasn't been within the last two years from what I can remember.  Yet that is the current exchange rate being applied to visa fee's by the UK Embassy in Bangkok "These fees are effective for all visa applications made from 6 April 2011. The consular rate of exchange is 52 Baht [THB] to £1". 

The UKBA website sets the settlement visa fee at £810 or 42120thb using their out of date exhange rate of 52thb to the £.  In reality, using the ACTUAL rate which is more like 48.5thb, that makes the fee substantially more at around £868. 
Given that the Embassy process hundreds of visa's every month, that difference in fee must be making them thousands of pounds over and above what they should be charging than if the fee's were linked to current exchange rates.  For example, the statistics for processing visa's found on the guidance to processing times, claims that 146 settlement visa decisions were made in May.  146x the difference of £58 would make the Embassy £8.5k more than they should be charging by using the current rates.  Surely it would be a much more fair system to regularly update the exhange rate, even on a monthly basis?
I can't help but feel that the government are maintaining the out of date rate as another way of squeezing even more money from those that have no choice but to pay.  Afterall, what price do you put on being able to join your loved ones in the UK?

http://www.ukvisas.gov.uk/en/howtoapply/visafees/visafeessettlement
http://www.vfs-uk-th.com/visafees.aspx